About FindTruth

Why I built it

The news is easy to follow and hard to question. A headline, a clip, or a post arrives with the conclusion already attached. I wanted a place where you look at the sides of a topic, check what is actually being said, and make up your own mind. That means research, investigation, and logic, not taking the feed at its word.

I also wanted a fast way to check a claim that is moving on social media. Type the question, paste a link, or attach a screenshot of the post. Left, Middle, and Right each argue it, and each one cites sources you can open.

People read in short pieces now, so the answers are short enough to take in on a phone. If you want to go further, the citations, a follow-up question, and the Debate Room are there. The point is not to hand you a verdict. The point is to put the arguments in front of you and let you decide.

Compare perspectives. Check the evidence.

FindTruth helps you explore news and questions through three AI agents deliberately assigned Left, Middle, and Right positions. They argue those positions on purpose, so you can compare their reasoning and examine the sources behind their claims.

These are generated perspectives, not human commentators or FindTruth’s views. The Middle is a perspective too, not a guarantee of neutrality or a final verdict. Agreement between agents does not establish that a claim is true.

Know the limits

AI can invent details, overlook context, repeat bias, or rely on outdated information. FindTruth is a starting point for inquiry, not a substitute for original reporting or qualified medical, legal, financial, or other professional advice.

You can use FindTruth without signing in. Optional sign-in lets you keep history across devices. Debates can have public links, so do not submit confidential information. Read our Privacy Policy for details.

Help us improve

Found an error, a broken source, or a problem using the site? Contact FindTruth with the debate link and what you noticed.